Good evening, Rusty!
Now, I have been thinking.....
We were talking earlier about the relocation of areas, etcetera ...parts, for example, of Kent now belonging to London....
But these parts did not change to a London post code when this happened (I think it was in 1965) but kept their original postal coding.
However ....folk who have the original London coding are charged extra for Insurances, for example, than are their immediate "acquired" neighbours..... who now officially "belong to London" but still retain a non-London postcode!
( You may not know that living in London puts up the cost of Insurances but it does!)
Now , is this fair?
Where I live, I have a London postcode......
Five hundred yards away.....my neighbouring village now also belongs to Greater London, as do I, but still retains its Kent postcode....
But I pay more for my pet Insurance, for example, than does my neighbouring villager, because of my London postcode.
There has to be an injustice here?