Well, I enjoyed the puzzle and all the connections. But I can’t agree that the red-herring/elephant-trap was “brilliant”, or any of the other positive words applied to it here. There was no way to detect it as a trap, or discern the correct approach, from the material given. That just made it tiresome. A more carefully written preamble could have resolved that, and made it into a clever trap, but as written the preamble definitely suggests that “a more modern hunter” and “a successful hunter” are different people. I found that carelessness (or, if it was deliberate, tiresomeness) and some shaky clueing slightly — but only slightly — spoiled an otherwise ingenious puzzle.