I agree, malone, that this was a lovely puzzle. And it made a nice change not to have misprints in the clues or clashing cells.
It took me longer than it should have because I thought it was going to be a fictional, Raffles type crime. Also searches on the internet on paying for the TV licence only threw up the current debates on it.
I'm not quite old to enough to remember this crime and the culprit has an unusual name that does not leap out of the puzzle, so there was a lot of grid staring.