Drxx,
Actually there is an error in this : "meursault - You haven't given enough consideration to other views if you think that posting a complete solution to the puzzle is within the limits of what was discussed a few weeks ago. Your habit of giving unsolicited answers wasn't appreciated then, by just about everyone (myself included). Now you've upped the stakes to a ridiculous degree. "
I have given very much consideration all round. Which answers are unsoiicited ? What is the difference between saying (on Saturday as S_Pugh has done previously) that to answer a question on the board would give the game away, but the person can e-mail for an answer ? So there are precedents for people offering to give up the secrets of the puzzle early on. To bleat now about the poor setter is just cant. And can you tell me the difference between someone offering the answers via e-mail or via facebook ? Does it offend you that there is apparently a 1 to 1 in contrast to a 1 to many ? But if someone has been prepared, on a Saturday, to give up the crucial answer to a puzzle, even to only one person, then hasn't a threshold been crossed ?
You should look again at the comment on the answers thread. It offers only that if you want to find answers you can. Here is a parting comment concerning the book which Johannes de Silentio was the author of, "The tremendous importance of respecting a person’s individuality within a society, one of the key messages of this work, has been repeatedly confirmed in the world, in a shocking manner, through the manifestation of its antithesis - the periodic appearance of dictatorial regimes." This was written by Michael Watts, who wrote an excellent book himself, on the subject.