Greengage, yes. Only highlighting the killer AND the other entangled character produces an appropriate (and poignant) endgame. I have in the past swapped test-solves with Dysart and I've always been impressed by his ability to produce clues with excellent surface reading. I'll miss his test-solving input, which has clearly improved my initial efforts. RIP Dysart
Ignore that. Now have the man, the killer, the victim and the three letters. Just now can't find a plausible closed loop. Hopefully inspiration will strike soon.
I will always remember Dysart fondly for his taking the lamb out of the freezer and feeding it to the police puzzle from a few years ago, which was one of my favourite ever Listeners. RIP.
Grid staring AGAIN - and I'm severely hampered by a irresistible conviction that there is a good reason that 11d (and I should have read the last sentence in the rubric!) is not in the BRB.
Candledave - YES means both the killer AND the other entangled should be highlighted. ONLY by doing that will the solver reach the intended endgame. That's my view, anyway. I hope that's clear.
A puzzle of 38d quality. Like SH @23, I still remember the leg of lamb murder; it was early in my Listener experience and I was fairly awe-struck that someone could construct such a thing just to amuse me, RIP indeed.
Each to his ain, CD; for what it’s worth, I’m with Mme Arcati in seeing the complete closed path as an important part of the final picture. Also I can’t see what logic you could apply that would allow you to choose which of the otherwise duplicated letters to highlight.