Yes, geeker, I agree about Adams. He ground out a tricky Q and P ending v Willow in the last round, determined to win when a draw was sufficient for sole first place. I have just returned from Leicester where I played in the Over-65 Championship. I was happy to get a plus score (4/7) finishing =11th out of 52 when my starting rank was 27th. Because in Round 1 the top half is paired against the bottom half, I had to play the overwhelming favourite, Terry Chapman (2248).
My rating has taken a battering recently (down to 1890) so it was no surprise to lose to him.
However, there was a twist in the final round (7), which as usual started at 10 a.m. instead of 2.30 p.m.. Terry Chapman had lost to Alan Punnett in the penultimate round after starting with 5/5. Nevertheless he was still joint leader and the top pairings were Sheila Jackson(2039) 5 v Alan Punnett(2051) 5; Terry Chapman (2248) 5 v David Fryer (1880) 4.5.
Everyone knew about the 10 a.m. start but Chapman’s watch had stopped and he arrived late at 10.36 having been defaulted under the rules at 10.30. The top board immediately agreed a draw and none of the other players on 4.5 managed to win, so there was a three-way tie for first place on 5.5, with Fryer benefiting from the free default point. Gutting for Chapman but rules is rules.
I had a ringside seat for the culmination of a fine Championship performance by Steve Jones (2175) who won in the last round v GM Daniel Fernandez (2518) with an exciting king hunt to finish 2nd on his own (he had lost to Adams in Round 1!).
The technology is fantastic nowadays with the top four games displayed on large screens behind the players and loads of other games (on 'live' boards) from various sections being available live on the internet. Even my last round game as low as Board 13 of the 0-65 was online.