mpfs- isn't the "l" business universal, ie we (the royal one, as in Mrs T) always double them in that kind of situation, and you, in America, do not??
jigjag, if you need any advice about relationships, ask away!!! (grin)
For 29 years I have been looking at censuses. The 1911 one has great scope for amusement. There was a column for "Infirmities". among which was recorded "bad- tempered" and "greedy". Less amusing (but one can see why) was the reaction of some women - "No persons in this house, only women". "If I can't vote I don't count".
A few people included their pets - name Tom, occupation, mouse-catcher, number of children , about 100.
Occupations from the 1881 census-
Knight of the Thimble (presumably this really existed)
Dead
Beef twister
Rotter's boy (? to do with linen rhetting? Yeah, I know it can be spelled retting)
There are also some wonderful names and some surnames which indictate foundlings- Churchyard for example.
Much earlier some first names were extraordinary. In my own family tree, Xenobia, Admonition and Philadelphia occur. I have read of Humiliation. Poor children (kids are baby goats)
Think that's enough for now