Crossword Help Forum
Forum Rules

I read this in the Telegraph today:

It’s not you who is under attack.

It's a common mistake to assume "who" is always followed by the third person. It’s not you who are under attack.

I rang British Gas with a complaint, and the recorded message advised that I could "give a meter reed" by pressing a number. There was no indication of what they are, or how to donate them to the company. Rather puzzling.

Jigjag

I have no idea what they are, and I thought I knew a lot about grasses. It could be a musical reference. I keep some spare clarinet reeds in the meter cupboard. I suppose if you kept some grasses in there, they could be meter reeds, but it seems unlikely.

Great British menu
Oh no, the chefs keep saying "ballontine". There's no middle N - it's "ballotine".

The Times page 6 today lists the exercises performed by the King each day. More evidence for my theory that 'lay' is supplanting 'lie' in some contexts.

Lay on back with feet apart...
Lay on front, raise head...
Lay on front, straighten arms...

To be fair, this is not directly Times journalism, as the exercises were devised for the Royal Canadian Airforce.

Perhaps North American English approves of 'lay' in this context?

Chrise

They must have been thinking of Duncan Bannatyne.

Paul

You are being too kind to the TImes. It is lie and they should say so, whatever Canadians think.

Paul,
You have the basis for a letter to the editor. I feel sure it would be published.

Sir, …

Having looked up the original document, I can report that 'lay' does not occur.
https://csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rfburger/5bx-plan.pdf

I therefore concur with Grunger that the Times' use of English is questionable, while Paulh has proof for his theory.

Unless, of course, these were instructions issued to the royal household on how to assist HRH in an emergency situation, in which case the Times is faultless - though I would rather see 'place' than 'lay'

Quite right Grunger! Lie is correct. Why must we follow the American misuse of language.

Another common misuse of a word , I was sat. No you weren't, you were sitting!