Certainly less demanding than last week, but also not as satisfying.
I could not help noticing that in several cases the restoration of the 'real' word resulted in a clue which did not read well. This was particularly so when it was an anagram clue, so there could be little doubt about how the extra/omitted/misprinted letter worked.
Examples: 33, 35 (certainly bizarre), 9,13. 16, 21, 28
In other cases, the revised clue made perfect sense.