CancelReport This Post

Please fill out the form below with your name, e-mail address and the reason(s) you wish to report this post.

 

Crossword Help Forum
Forum Rules

kt17

19th December 2019, 14:59
The Spectator's Christmas puzzle this year was not a pencil-chewer: maybe too small; not devious enough; peripheral quotation too easily gotten; maybe the theme was just too well trodden, or too few unclued and hidden things to find.

Other than that I loved it!
1 of 24  -   Report This Post

kirky

19th December 2019, 16:36
yes i too expected a much bigger grid ... never mind ... it filled a dull morning!
2 of 24  -   Report This Post

kt17

19th December 2019, 17:04
Kirky - quietly I'll say it, I'm a bit disappointed - I really look forward to a zinger for Christmas and I want to be absorbed for longer and pushed a little harder.

Ah well I'll be looking out for big fat Xmas puzzles in the broadsheets instead!

Happy Christmas
3 of 24  -   Report This Post

malone

19th December 2019, 17:17
KT17, I think I feel much the same as you. The puzzle was great while it lasted … but it didn't last long enough! A few tougher clues would have made us work a little harder, I wouldn't have minded that.
4 of 24  -   Report This Post

turast

19th December 2019, 21:06
I agree with the above comments, more of an amuse-bouche than a full turkey dinner. Was anyone else puzzled by 3 down? There seems to be only one possibility, but I can't track down the panic and scuffle elements in Chambers. Similarly, I don't follow "Classic shipboard plants", but again, there only seems to be one possibility. I'd be pleased if anybody could clarify these two for me.
5 of 24  -   Report This Post

malone

19th December 2019, 21:12
Turast, my Chambers dealt with the panic and scuffle OK - I think the definition of the answer sent me off to confirm the first part and the the 'scuffle' was covered in its definition. (I've not got access to Chambers right now.

The 'classic...' is an event and the clue answer definitely fits the other two words.
6 of 24  -   Report This Post

specsaver

19th December 2019, 21:27
Agree with above. Very disappointing after recent Christmas efforts - shall have no excuse not to talk to the Mrs now...
7 of 24  -   Report This Post

malone

19th December 2019, 21:55
Turast, I've been reunited with Chambers... The second definition of the answer to 3 D sends you to a very similar word, and one of the definitions for that is 'panic'. The answer itself is also specifically listed in the definition for 'scuffle'.
8 of 24  -   Report This Post

kt17

19th December 2019, 21:57
Specsaver - then perhaps Mrs Specsaver will be as disappointed in the quality of the puzzle as you! ; )
9 of 24  -   Report This Post

gerba

19th December 2019, 22:42
When I first subscribed to the Spectator, they had writers of the calibre of Auberon Waugh and Frank Johnson ... and the Christmas crossword was a two grid stinker that often outlasted the turkey. Nowadays we get third raters like James Delingpole and guest diarists such as Kirsty Allsop. So I guess that this limp apology for a Christmas puzzle is little surprise as the Spectator shifts from being an intellectual work-out to a lifestyle glossy putting advertisers in tough with high rollers, who are not interested that litotes is an anagram of TS Eliot as they haven't heard of either.
10 of 24  -   Report This Post