Karen,
You take what somebody else says literally, but expect others to divine that what you say should not be. Thank you for explaining to me (and Mondrain at least) that you were
being tongue in cheek. My remark on "another thread" was simply a comment on your total lack of any sense of humour on being gently chided for your,frankly ludicrous,"clue"
When Bees asked for a clue to help move on from ?E?R?. your response was "Think M (for medium) + ERR (for slip up) + Y (for second half of by). Hope that helps". Well it certainly ought to didn't it. You say Bees is not thick (who implied he was?) but you again say "Hope that helped". How you square such nonsense with 'we don't give answers only further clues' defies belief. Surely you can see the absurdity.
Finally. You ask why I visit the RT thread - the same reasons you flick through most threads on here. Admittedly, I find your thread more amusing (unintentionally unfortunately) than most. You couldn't make up some of the posts- like your additional clue.
You guys wonder why your thread attracts trolls and imposters. I'm surprised you don't attract more. I rather regret now offering my support when your last thread was messed about with.