3 King George, say - different when topless
?R?G?R?O?S
Obviously gregarious, definition matey. Must be anagrammatic involving george sa(y) but I don’t get it especially the topless reference. Charles 1 was beheaded, no George as far as I know
I don’t agree with that at all, Jono. If something is defined as the transmission or receipt of something, it does not follow that the verb can be either to transmit or receive it. If I said I bribed you, no one would take it to mean I took money from you. It simply doesn’t mean that
To amplify #14, someone is guilty of bribery if they either gave or accepted an illegal inducement. But both parties do not bribe. One bribes, the other is bribed.