Crossword Help Forum
Forum Rules

Just to let you know I have emailed admin about this matter.

After my exchange of emails with Norah she has decided that as I was the only person who raised this matter she would rather let sleeping dogs lie. I think the episode was very unfortunate and that it's rather a pity that it has gone unresolved.

Since your Topic seemed to be directed at just two individuals I didn't think this to be any of my business.
However, if you could outline your gripe you might get some support.

Thanks, kenyatta, this is about an episode that happened towards the end of CLUELESS 155 - all the participants know what this is about but if you are at all interested have a look.

Rambler, you seem to have taken this on with absolutely no defensive evidence of my statement made and don't for a minute expect something from me by way of an apology (RE: Clueless 155 - Post 57) because it isn't coming as I fully believe in what I typed. Also, I am not an IT expert but would take a fair guess that the owners of this site who you seem to be sycophantically attempting to be currying favour with have some degree of access (more than us) to information of our ISP addresses and maybe know exactly who is using multiple guises to create whatever they intend to use them for.
I don't have a problem with site users creating multiple characters. What I do have a problem with is when they use this covert Janus-faced practice to cross-vote for each of them to muster votes for an almost certain odds-on chance of winning which takes away votes for much cleverer wordplay entries.
Maybe the owners can see that there is some truth in what I say and that is why it's been left alone to save embarrassment to certain posters.
I will not be exposing the person in question (it's just not cricket) unless that person wants to directly challenge me to which I would have no choice other than to expose the whole facade.
Now run along because I would hate to keep you from your neighbourhood watch meeting.

I agree with stevezodiac's opinion of les40 - I think he is insufferable. He has thrown a shadow over PEER REVIEW with his post. If anybody has been guilty of cross voting they should be named and allowed to defend themseves. Past experience tells me not to expect any support on this matter.

Has anyone else had suspicions about multiple identities and self-voting on Peer Review? I may be naive, but nothing (apart from stevezodiac's moan a few weeks ago) has suggested it to me.

Didn't the tightening up by Ash and Nora after the spoofing hiccough a year or two ago prevent multiple identities?

Rambler this has far wider implications. The same people at Peer review play Clueless and most of them are also Joint Effort contributors! (to which Les has the Emails?) Get with the bigger picture!

Not Cheers!

Chris really?

Anyone with a home PC Laptop Iphone and Tab can be 4 different people if the choose.

I'm sure rambler is being mindful of his J &S rebuke (which his dual character was obviously not intended for covert purposes) however I am extremely surprised it has taken so long for this equally obvious charade to be "unmasked".