PEER REVIEW 37
A bit earlier than usual, as I am going away for the weekend shortly.
This is a competition for clue setters. The idea (like CLUELESS) is to set a cryptic clue to a given word. Unlike Clueless you will be judged by your peers and not the setter of the clue word.
Multiple entries are welcome. You MUST post a clue for your vote to count. One vote per contestant – please state the post number you are voting for.
The entry with the most qualifying votes wins and sets next week’s PEER REVIEW. In the event of a tie the setter chooses the winner.
There is a (roughly) one day time frame. Your clue must be posted by 5pm UK time on Friday, when voting opens. Voting theoretically closes at 9pm UK time on Friday, but I probably won’t be able to announce the winner until Saturday morning, so late votes may count. Please await the prize before congratulating the winner. Thanks.
The setter donates an online prize and reserves the right to change the rules in order to deal with unforeseen circumstances.
Feel free to include an explanation of your clue just in case solver-voters cannot appreciate your clue.
The word to be clued this week is
SERENDIPITOUS (13)
Good Luck!
ChrisE