CancelReport This Post

Please fill out the form below with your name, e-mail address and the reason(s) you wish to report this post.

 

Crossword Help Forum
Forum Rules

elle

26th December 2018, 14:51
Good afternoon, Rusty!
Ah.... well, at least you now know how to wash your coat!
In this instance, "flocking" means "clumping together".
It is apparently essential to prevent the down from clumping whilst drying.
Right, now...….
After a lot of effort ( in between a drop- in visitor, and a long phone call from a daughter) I am finally down to three clues that I cannot do!
I have 21a: P?U?I?T
24a: L?B?I?D
27a: S?L?N?E?Y
I got "Lully" for the composer in 23d, thanks to your hint about Anne B knowing,
but cannot parse it?
What am I not seeing, please?
24751 of 30765  -   Report This Post

rusty

26th December 2018, 14:59
Hello, Elle!
21 is "Poujadist", anagram, something to do with a French lad.
24 is "lobbied", "lob" is an old term for a "lout" apparently, and "one/I" in "bed", (not up yet).
I liked that one!
27 is "splintery", notice is "spy", the ship is a "liner", with "t" for temperature, within.
I wonder if the setter is meaning "lully" as in lullaby.
Does "lull" mean relax?
I have not looked it up.
24752 of 30765  -   Report This Post

elle

26th December 2018, 15:34
Hi, Rusty!
Thank you for your help…..
I have never heard of a "poujadist!
I can see now that it an anagram of "paid o just"...but would never have arrived at that by myself.
Collins Online dictionary tells me that
"Poujadism is:
a conservative reactionary movement to protect the business interests of small traders"
I understand the others now that you have explained them to me.
Yes. "lull", used as a verb, can mean "relax".
So doe the "y" come from the word "you" in the clue?
I didn't know that "y" is an accepted abbreviation/alternative / whatever the terminology is/ for "you"?
I have just consulted Anne B, but she doesn't have it?
24753 of 30765  -   Report This Post

rusty

26th December 2018, 15:40
Hello, Elle!
For me, no, I don't think the "y" comes from there.
The "?" at the end suggests to me that the setter means "lully" as meaning "susceptible to being lulled", if that makes any sense?
I suggest the setter is having a bit of fun and creating a new "word"?
That's my guess, but I could be way wrong!
24754 of 30765  -   Report This Post

elle

26th December 2018, 16:02
Hi, Rusty!
Oh, I see...I hadn't thought of that.
You may well be right.....
It would certainly account for the question mark, wouldn't it?
I'm not sure I like it, though?
24755 of 30765  -   Report This Post

rusty

26th December 2018, 16:11
Hello, Elle!
For me the "?" indicates the setter is only suggesting the word.
Probably because it does not exist, apart from a proper name.
Can't see it in Chambers or Collins.
I think it's okay-ish, but I would understand if some folk objected to it.
24756 of 30765  -   Report This Post

rosalind

26th December 2018, 16:55
Lully is a word in the Urban dictionary, meaning something warm and cuddly. Not that it matters, since that isn't a recognised dictionary..

Christmas dinner totally spoiled by an argument over a sprout, a single blasted sprout.
24757 of 30765  -   Report This Post

elle

26th December 2018, 18:25
Good evening, Rusty!
I strongly suspect that you are right about "lully" - it is the question mark that has decided me!
I might have a go at the Jumbo GK after dinner...
I have been reading - of all things, as I haven't read one for years! - an Agatha Christie novel that I "found".
Yet another one that bears my maiden name!
(I think I used to write my name in my books back in my student days when I was flat-sharing! so you can see how old is the book!)
Funnily enough, I also uncovered the programme of "The Mousetrap" yesterday!

Ros, you seem to be dogged by sprouts....!
What happened?
24758 of 30765  -   Report This Post

chrise

26th December 2018, 19:01
Oh dear, rosalind! A sprout, of all things. Was it a bad one? I remember a meal at college when the great Brussels Sprout revolution took place - they were so awful that every table had piles of them left on the serving dishes.

We had loads left over from yesterday, so they re-appeared in bubble and squeak. Needless to say, I didn't eat that either!
24759 of 30765  -   Report This Post

rosalind

26th December 2018, 19:15
Child required to eat just one, wouldn't. Melt down all round. Surely an amnesty on Christmas Day would be in order? They were perfectly OK (a lot of work is being done to breed out the chemical that some people can taste), but you get the picture.
24760 of 30765  -   Report This Post